Budaka District

by August 18, 2018

The access rates in Budaka vary from 58 % in Naboa Sub-County to 95 % in Iki-Iki Sub-County. Budaka has 721 domestic water points which serve a total of 196,307 people – 174,658 in rural areas. 56 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Budaka has 1 piped schemes.

Access

83%

Rural Functionality

93%

Equity

55

Management

86%

Gender

77%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
KKL Kakule 571
Kakule
Population 571
KCH Kachomo 562
Kachomo
Population 562
LYM Lyama 437
Lyama
Population 437
NNS Nansanga 487
Nansanga
Population 487
BTC Budaka TC 733
Budaka TC
Population 733
BDK Budaka 547
Budaka
Population 547
NBA Naboa 518
Naboa
Population 518
KDR Kaderuna 655
Kaderuna
Population 655
IKI Iki-Iki 670
Iki-Iki
Population 670
KMR Kameruka 544
Kameruka
Population 544
KMN Kamonkoli 671
Kamonkoli
Population 671
MGT Mugiti 746
Mugiti
Population 746
KTR Katiira 600
Katiira
Population 600

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 83 %
Rural Access 83 %
Urban Access 80 %

BDK Budaka 83 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,500
BTC Budaka TC 80 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 20,255
KCH Kachomo 95 %
Kachomo
Population Served 15,710
KDR Kaderuna 89 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,321
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 13,537
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,400
KTR Katiira 77 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 75 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,227
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,473

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 83 %
Rural Access 83 %
Urban Access 80 %

BDK Budaka 83 %
Budaka
Population Served 10,500
BTC Budaka TC 80 %
Budaka TC
Population Served 21,649
IKI Iki-Iki 95 %
Iki-Iki
Population Served 20,255
KCH Kachomo 95 %
Kachomo
Population Served 15,710
KDR Kaderuna 89 %
Kaderuna
Population Served 17,321
KKL Kakule 95 %
Kakule
Population Served 13,537
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Population Served NWSC
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Population Served 15,400
KTR Katiira 77 %
Katiira
Population Served 14,306
LYM Lyama 75 %
Lyama
Population Served 16,300
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Population Served NWSC
NBA Naboa 58 %
Naboa
Population Served 9,227
NNS Nansanga 95 %
Nansanga
Population Served 10,473

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 93 %
Urban Functionality 81 %

BDK Budaka 95 %
Budaka
Functional Sources 36
BTC Budaka TC 81 %
Budaka TC
Functional Sources 44
IKI Iki-Iki 91 %
Iki-Iki
Functional Sources 72
KCH Kachomo 97 %
Kachomo
Functional Sources 59
KDR Kaderuna 97 %
Kaderuna
Functional Sources 65
KKL Kakule 93 %
Kakule
Functional Sources 57
KMN Kamonkoli NWSC
Kamonkoli
Functional Sources 80
KMR Kameruka 90 %
Kameruka
Functional Sources 55
KTR Katiira 96 %
Katiira
Functional Sources 48
LYM Lyama 91 %
Lyama
Functional Sources 50
MGT Mugiti NWSC
Mugiti
Functional Sources 31
NBA Naboa 76 %
Naboa
Functional Sources 28
NNS Nansanga 98 %
Nansanga
Functional Sources 40

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
BUDAKA                               
 1 KakuleRural14,25013,53895%93%--17-17---40343-11------------No
 2 NaboaRural15,9149,22758%76%--314---25328-55------------No
 3 Iki-IkiRural21,32320,25795%91%--2332612348250----11---------No
 4 KatiiraRural18,51414,30677%96%--4-421342-42-11------------No
 5 NansangaRural11,02510,47495%98%--314---37-37---------------No
 6 Budaka TCUrban27,14821,64980%-81%-819213303332-2------2572861913No
 7 KamerukaRural17,05815,40090%90%--2632932526127---------------No
 8 KamonkoliRural28,084NWSCNWSC93%--16-16---63265134-------11---Yes
 9 MugitiRural13,106NWSCNWSC100%--4-4---26-26---------1-1---Yes
 10 KachomoRural16,53815,71195%97%--141153-341-41112------------No
 11 LyamaRural21,84316,30075%91%--2-2---48553---------------No
 12 KaderunaRural19,45117,32189%97%-100%16-161-1451463141-1---------No
 13 BudakaRural12,69010,50083%95%--9-9---27229---------------No
Total 236,922196,30283938150145101551261849822520712191120003692861913No
District 236,922196,30283938150145101551261849822520712191120003692861913No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Unknown10011000000
Total10010000000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee