Oyam District

by October 18, 2018

The access rates in Oyam vary from 46 % in Kamdini Sub-County to 95 % in Abok Sub-County. Oyam has 1,170 domestic water points which serve a total of 307,499 people – 301,231 in rural areas. 116 water points have been non-functional for over 5 years and are considered abandoned. Oyam has 9 piped schemes.

Access

71%

Rural Functionality

90%

Equity

81

Management

95%

Gender

95%

Population Density (people/km2) and Population

50 250 1,000 2,000
  100 500 1,500  
MNK Minakulu 185
Minakulu
Population 185
ICM Iceme 206
Iceme
Population 206
NGI Ngai 181
Ngai
Population 181
ACB Acaba 187
Acaba
Population 187
LRO Loro 211
Loro
Population 211
MYN Myene 169
Myene
Population 169
ABR Aber 143
Aber
Population 143
KMD Kamdini 334
Kamdini
Population 334
ALK Aleka 265
Aleka
Population 265
OTC Oyam TC 282
Oyam TC
Population 282
ABK Abok 145
Abok
Population 145
OTW Otwal 214
Otwal
Population 214

Population figures are projections to the above mentioned date based on UBOS census 2014 and district growth rates. Population density is calculated on land area only. Boundaries reflect the preliminary status only.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 71 %
Rural Access 72 %
Urban Access 47 %

ABK Abok 95 %
Abok
Population Served 18,672
ABR Aber 70 %
Aber
Population Served 26,200
ACB Acaba 69 %
Acaba
Population Served 21,724
ALK Aleka 79 %
Aleka
Population Served 26,400
ICM Iceme 87 %
Iceme
Population Served 45,440
KMD Kamdini 46 %
Kamdini
Population Served 20,962
LRO Loro 77 %
Loro
Population Served 47,610
MNK Minakulu 64 %
Minakulu
Population Served 27,406
MYN Myene 53 %
Myene
Population Served 16,418
NGI Ngai 84 %
Ngai
Population Served 27,212
OTC Oyam TC 47 %
Oyam TC
Population Served 6,268
OTW Otwal 79 %
Otwal
Population Served 23,186

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Access to Safe Water

20 % 60 %
  40 % 80 %
Total Access 71 %
Rural Access 72 %
Urban Access 47 %

ABK Abok 95 %
Abok
Population Served 18,672
ABR Aber 70 %
Aber
Population Served 26,200
ACB Acaba 69 %
Acaba
Population Served 21,724
ALK Aleka 79 %
Aleka
Population Served 26,400
ICM Iceme 87 %
Iceme
Population Served 45,440
KMD Kamdini 46 %
Kamdini
Population Served 20,962
LRO Loro 77 %
Loro
Population Served 47,610
MNK Minakulu 64 %
Minakulu
Population Served 27,406
MYN Myene 53 %
Myene
Population Served 16,418
NGI Ngai 84 %
Ngai
Population Served 27,212
OTC Oyam TC 47 %
Oyam TC
Population Served 6,268
OTW Otwal 79 %
Otwal
Population Served 23,186

Access to safe water is the ratio of people served by a safe water point and piped water supply to the total population.
The calculation is based on an estimated number of people per water point type. Maximum access rate can be 95%.

Functionality of Point Water Sources

60 % 80 %
70 % 90 %
Rural Functionality 90 %
Urban Functionality 92 %

ABK Abok 92 %
Abok
Functional Sources 80
ABR Aber 92 %
Aber
Functional Sources 81
ACB Acaba 83 %
Acaba
Functional Sources 65
ALK Aleka 97 %
Aleka
Functional Sources 90
ICM Iceme 91 %
Iceme
Functional Sources 177
KMD Kamdini 95 %
Kamdini
Functional Sources 71
LRO Loro 92 %
Loro
Functional Sources 158
MNK Minakulu 75 %
Minakulu
Functional Sources 75
MYN Myene 93 %
Myene
Functional Sources 57
NGI Ngai 81 %
Ngai
Functional Sources 85
OTC Oyam TC 92 %
Oyam TC
Functional Sources 23
OTW Otwal 100 %
Otwal
Functional Sources 92

Functionality is the ratio of functional water sources to all water sources. Sources not operating for five or more years are assumed to be abandoned, and hence are not included in the calculation.

People served per technology

Reasons for non-functionality

Type of Management

Source of Funding

District Water Supply Summary

Sub-CountyUrban/
Rural
PopulationPopulation
Served
AccessFunctionalityPoint Water SourcesPiped Water Systems
Protected
springs
Shallow wellsDeep boreholesRainwater
harvesting tanks
DamsValley
tanks
PSP/Kiosk, Tap standsYTHHICNWSC
RUWfPFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTotFNFTot
OYAM                               
 1 NgaiRural32,55327,21284%81%--322341962533942112-------22---No
 2 AberRural37,54526,20070%92%--2-21752262264------------134--No
 3 MyeneRural30,99316,41853%93%--10-102112224226213------------No
 4 OtwalRural29,32923,18679%100%--25-2524-2436-366-6----111-1---No
 5 AlekaRural33,28126,40079%97%--15-1534-3441344---------------No
 6 MinakuluRural42,74527,40664%75%--2122317421371855-11------------No
 7 AcabaRural31,61721,72469%83%--5-52362937340-44------------No
 8 KamdiniRural45,86620,96246%95%--8-832335281292-2------1-1---No
 9 LoroRural62,09047,61077%92%--9-96610767247610-10------1-1---No
 10 AbokRural19,65718,67495%92%--251261922135338112------------No
 11 IcemeRural52,52245,44087%91%--73-7338341535588715------527---No
 12 Oyam TCUrban13,2086,26847%-92%-2-25-514-14213-------11---No
Total 431,372307,498719092022752323154035547250522321648000011851313400No
District 431,372307,498719092022752323154035547250522321648000011851313400No

F = Functional; NF = Non-Functional; Tot = Total; YT = Yard Tap; HH = Household Connections; IC = Institutional Connections

Piped Water Supply Systems

Type of Scheme/GFSNumber of
Schemes
Functionality of SystemType of ManagementWB in place
FunctionalNon-FunctionalPartially FunctionalPrivate OperatorWSCPrivate/IndividualNWSCOtherYesNo
Groundwater based/Not GFS98102600000
Unknown/Not GFS22000000000
Total1110100600000

GFS = Gravity Flow Scheme; WB = Water Board; WSC = Water Source Committee